East Ramapo financial update flags rising transportation costs; board reviews energy financing and curriculum investments
Loading...
Summary
District staff told trustees that transportation contract costs rose sharply and that an adjusted state aid formula will offset most of the increase; administration proposed a 1.28% tax-levy rise, continued instructional investments and financing for an Ameresco energy performance contract.
District finance and operations staff presented a budget update and several capital and instructional proposals at the board's March 10 meeting, cautioning that transportation contracts and other costs drove a projected increase in the expenditure budget and a plan to use a portion of fund balance as a temporary measure.
Finance presenter Stark said changes to the district's non-allowable pupil decimal for transportation increased projected state aid by roughly $8 million and that the district had moved $10 million from fund balance into expenditure accounts to cover higher transportation contract costs. Stark said the budget projection shows $352.7 million in projected expenditures and a projected use of fund balance that would reduce the district's fund balance by about $8.5 million from the beginning balance.
"We will actually receive approximately $8,000,000 more in state aid," Stark said, describing a consultant's recalculation of the transportation factor. He also said the district is projecting an overall budget increase and is proposing a tax levy increase of about 1.28% (roughly $2 million) in the 2026-27 proposed budget.
On facilities, the board heard a presentation from Matthew Ferdino of Ameresco (the energy-service company selected in 2023) on an energy performance contract already under contract with the district. Ferdino explained the five measures included in the project: LED retrofits, an integrated energy management system, unit ventilator replacements, infiltration reductions and vending-machine controls. He said the contract guarantees energy savings under state rules and will be measured and verified; the district placed financing for the energy contract on the meeting's agenda.
Trustees pressed administration for more detail and accountability: questions included requests for building-by-building updates on what ARPA or capital funds have already paid for, clarification of how many positions remain vacant and why certain line items rose, and the expected educational impact of $3.9 million in proposed instructional investments (literacy, math and high-school supports). Several trustees sought clearer, published breakdowns before the budget vote.
Administration also outlined staffing needs and vacancies: dozens of retirements were reported and dozens of positions either unfilled or covered as "point twos" (partial assignments), and the administration proposed several new positions for FY26-27 including directors of transportation, a director of literacy, an executive director for grants/funded programs, and school-level safety staffing.
Board members approved action items and consent motions at the meeting, and trustees scheduled further discussion and a series of public budget meetings ahead of the May 19 budget vote. Administration said it would provide more detailed building-condition and vacancy reports at the next board meeting.
