Bill to modernize security guard recertification wins industry support; state police implementation costs noted

Economic Matters Committee · March 27, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 365 would allow electronic recertification of security guards, remove obsolete paper-era language and eliminate certain late fees; NASCO and state police worked with the sponsor, though a roughly $100,000 implementation cost to the Maryland State Police was discussed.

Senator Waldstreicher told the committee SB 365 corrects statutory language left over from paper-based recertification and aligns security-guard renewals with other State Police certifications. The sponsor said the bill simplifies renewals, allows online filing up to the day a certificate expires and eliminates late fees that previously could reach $150.

John Pica and Steve Amate of the National Association of Security Companies (NASCO) testified that NASCO worked closely with the Maryland State Police on the bill and asked for a favorable report. "We worked with the state police on this bill, and it really modernizes the process for recertification of a security guard certificate or license," Pica said.

Committee members questioned a $100,000 fiscal note tied to the State Police's implementation costs. The sponsor said MSP expects implementation costs to be short-term and cost-neutral over time, because changes to renewal timing shift some receipts but do not reduce long-term revenue.

The committee discussed operational details including required notification timing (the bill requires MSP to send notices 90, 60 and 30 days before expiration), training consequences for lapses (missing a renewal can trigger an initial 12-hour training requirement versus an 8-hour recurring class), and the scope of affected security categories. Witnesses said the bill reduces administrative burdens and confusion created by paper-era language.

The hearing ended with no recorded vote; sponsors and industry representatives said they hoped for a favorable report from the committee.