Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a glance: key motions and unanimous approvals at Brea Olinda board meeting
Summary
The board carried a series of routine motions (minutes, consent calendar) and approved contracts and amendments including wireless access-point purchases, agreements for performing-arts center services, the annual transportation plan, PJHM architectural amendments for high-school projects, and gym/PAC flooring contracts — all recorded 4-0 unless otherwise noted.
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Brea Olinda Unified School District board approved multiple agenda items on March 19. All recorded motions below passed unanimously by a 4-0 vote.
Votes at a glance
- Agenda adoption (procedural) — motion carried 4-0.
- Minutes approval and consent calendar (including a $10,000 donation to the Brea Olinda High School boys tennis program from Matthew Chase) — carried 4-0.
- Vector USA agreement for wireless access points (six elementary sites): total quoted cost ~ $208,000; expected E-Rate Category 2 subsidy now at 60%, leaving a district share of about 40% (approx. $83,000) — carried 4-0.
- Sierra Receiving agreement for the Performing Arts Center — carried 4-0.
- Annual home-to-school transportation plan (required item) — carried 4-0.
- Agreement amendments with PJHM (architectural services) expanding scope for Brea Olinda High School modernization (path of travel/ADA, tennis courts, stadium turf conversion, bleachers, baseball/softball improvements and conduit for future projects): staff said combining scopes saved an estimated $400,000 in architectural fees; carried 4-0.
- Agreement for gym-floor replacement and Mike's Custom Flooring replacement for the Brea Olinda High School PAC seating and flooring (project numbers noted in the public record) — carried 4-0.
Staff noted that many of the construction contracts will be developed into bid packages and scheduled to limit impacts on user groups; trustees generally supported moving projects forward after staff returns with firm budgets and timelines.

