Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press council on wastewater emergency and why ferric chloride bid jumped
Summary
Residents asked why the wastewater plant’s ferric chloride procurement nearly doubled while council members described a recent ‘near catastrophic’ treatment‑plant failure that required a costly temporary diversion and repairs; staff said chemical contract and emergency response are separate issues and provided limited detail at the meeting.
Residents at the March 24 Warren City Council meeting pressed officials for answers about two related concerns: a recent emergency at the wastewater treatment plant and a large increase in the annual contract amount for ferric chloride used by the plant.
At the agenda‑item public comment period, resident Laurie Harris noted the consent agenda included a wastewater treatment plant request to award a ferric chloride contract and asked why the annual amount had risen from $112,000 to up to $268,000. "That's a huge, huge increase," Harris said, asking whether the price jump related to the recent plant emergency.
Council later acknowledged the emergency in their responses to audience members. A council member described the weekend incident as "a near catastrophic failure that could have resulted in sewage in every basement, every home, every business in the city," and said contractors and staff worked non‑stop to devise a temporary diversion and a later temporary fix. The council member said the repairs would be expensive and take time.
Planning and procurement staff did not connect a single cause for both issues at the meeting. The ferric chloride procurement question was raised as part of an agenda‑only comment about the consent agenda; staff did not provide details in the public record during the meeting about bid scope, procurement method, or the reason for the price increase. Council advised residents to call the planning department for more specific follow‑up on permitting and technical questions.
Officials signaled the city will need to spend for a temporary repair and will follow up with more detail but did not provide a full public post or press release during the March 24 meeting. One councilmember said they would have preferred a proactive public statement from the mayor’s office to explain the timeline and impact to residents.
Next steps: staff said they will make more information available and that residents can contact the planning and public‑works departments for details on procurement and repair timelines.
