School board adopts ICE-protection resolution affirming schools as safe, welcoming places
Loading...
Summary
The board unanimously adopted a resolution affirming Charlottesville City Schools will not voluntarily assist federal immigration enforcement beyond requirements of law, referencing Plyler v. Doe and directing staff to issue protocols and family information; staff said most items were already in practice.
The Charlottesville City School Board on March 31 adopted a resolution intended to keep schools safe and welcoming for students and families regardless of immigration status. The resolution, which cites the U.S. Supreme Court decision Plyler v. Doe, directs the division not to voluntarily assist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or other federal immigration enforcement, except as required by law.
The resolution requires that agents be presented with a valid judicial warrant signed by a judge before being granted access to non-public areas of school property, directs the superintendent to develop staff protocols for responding to any requests from immigration authorities, and instructs the division to provide families information about their rights and community resources.
Board discussion noted potential overlap with other priorities, including concerns raised elsewhere in the meeting about School Resource Officers and whether policies should treat different groups equitably. One board member asked whether the resolution would risk federal funding; staff reported federal funds (about $6.9 million) support some programs but said the items in the resolution largely reflect current practices. A board member stated they would abstain from the vote because of process concerns; the remainder voted to adopt the resolution.
Superintendent staff said the division already implements most of the actions described in the resolution and will formalize protocols and communication plans for families and staff. The board asked staff to clarify how the division will handle specific scenarios raised during public comment (for example, enforcement at bus stops) and to include implementation details at the April work session or in subsequent written reports.
