Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Activity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ferndale staff reports 14 new builds, administrative approvals and suggests GIS map; data centers flagged for review
Summary
City planning staff told the commission there have been 14 new builds (mostly single-family), one multifamily via PUD and one ADU; staff recommended a public GIS project-tracking map and noted data centers and similar resource-intensive uses will be addressed under a forthcoming moratorium review.
Get email alerts on the Planning Activity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City planning staff briefed the planning commission on development activity since the adoption of the updated zoning ordinance, reporting a total of 14 new builds (primarily R1 single-family), one multifamily development approved via PUD, and one accessory dwelling unit (ADU) established.
Staff said they also processed seven administrative approvals (minor/major changes) and have about five applications under active review. "The information, in the first chart shows there are a total of 14 new builds that have taken place, largely within the R1," staff reported, and confirmed details are available if the commission wants further breakdowns.
Commissioners and staff discussed making greater use of preapproved ADU plans or a pattern book to reduce barriers for homeowners, developing a public-facing GIS map showing ongoing projects and approval sunset dates, and pursuing consultant support to handle workload fluctuations. Staff said they will explore a GIS map of project statuses and expiration dates and can provide more detailed metrics on larger projects for future meetings.
Commissioners also flagged data centers as an emerging use that can stress infrastructure. Staff confirmed limited carve-outs in the pending moratorium language would exclude small-scale server rooms and existing legally established facilities but said data centers would be part of future review and suggested the commission consider a separate conversation on design and utility impacts.
No formal actions were taken; staff agreed to return with requested materials and suggested online postings and outreach (including a recorded Feb. 18 presentation) to help residents understand planning processes.

