Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Historic panel rejects $31,500 blog-post contract; asks staff to return with alternatives

Las Vegas Historic Preservation Commission · March 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to deny a proposed $31,500 contract to commission seven historic blog posts, citing concerns about cost, scope and procurement; staff and the city attorney were directed to propose a different contracting approach.

The Las Vegas Historic Preservation Commission on March 25 voted to deny without prejudice a proposed $31,500 contract to hire a single content creator to produce historic blog posts for the city website.

Staff presented a proposal from consultant Jeffrey Carlson that budgeted 50 hours per article at $90 an hour, totaling roughly $31,500 for seven pieces. Commissioners questioned whether that hourly model and the firm-fixed scope were appropriate, whether the commission should set a flat per-article fee, and whether a competitive request for qualifications would better serve the commission’s needs. "It seems crazy to say that's worth... approximately per article," Commissioner Levine said, questioning the per-piece cost.

City attorney Jim Lewis advised the commission that procurement law (NRS 3 32) governs purchasing; he recommended a request-for-qualifications approach if the commission wanted to prioritize quality over lowest price. Several commissioners said they wanted more control over topics and suggested staff return with options that would allow the commission to direct topics and set per-article parameters.

Commissioner Stodle moved to deny the contract without prejudice and direct staff to come back with an alternative approach; the motion carried with the chair voting in favor. Staff and the city attorney said they would explore contracting alternatives, including RFQs or a modified procurement approach, and return with revised agenda language.

Next steps: staff will consult with the city attorney and bring back a revised procurement approach and scope that reflects the commission’s preference for topic control and flexible article lengths.