Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Demolition Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners press applicant after renovation evolved into effective demolition at 115 Cliff Road
Summary
At the March 31 meeting the Historic District Commission flagged a case where an approved renovation appears to have been dismantled in the field, called for the applicant to supply all sequential submissions and minutes, and voted to hold the application while staff compiles the record.
The Nantucket Historic District Commission on March 31 asked the applicant for 115 Cliff Road to produce the full record after commissioners concluded the project in the field had progressed beyond the renovation shown in the paperwork.
Commissioners said the plans the applicant submitted and the drawings approved over several hearings indicated retaining much of the original fabric, but site photos and the applicant’s overlay drawings suggested only limited elements were left. “If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it’s a duck,” the chair said, arguing the work looked like an unlisted demolition.
Jason, a nearby resident who identified himself during public comment, told the commission he had seen only fragments of stud walls and cladding on site and questioned how much original material remained. The applicant’s agent said the areas marked in the submitted drawings that were to be retained were salvaged and will be reused, and that some full walls and rafters were preserved but other sections necessarily had to be dismantled to implement the new plan.
Commissioners pressed the applicant on whether the paper narrative application ever listed demolition. The applicant said demolition was not separately called out in the narrative because the plans evolved; the agent said demolition was inherent in the later design but not explicitly listed on the original application form.
Members described the case as precedent-setting. Commissioner Joe said the commission should require clearer submission standards going forward so reviewers can spot when an approval has become, in practice, a demolition. The board voted unanimously to hold the application and asked staff to compile the original submission, all sequential submissions, the final approval set, demo plans, meeting minutes with timestamps and the archived e-mails so members can compare what was approved with what was carried out.
The commission also said it has asked town counsel for clearer definitions and thresholds that would be legally tenable for distinguishing renovation from demolition and for determining penalties or corrective steps if an unapproved demolition is identified. The board will not reschedule the item until staff has provided the requested materials.
