Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge state review after forensic audit finds missing records in Halifax County

Halifax County Board of Supervisors · March 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After Premier Group presented a forensic audit showing widespread missing documentation and control gaps, several Halifax County residents urged the Board of Supervisors to seek a state review by the Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts and demanded rapid corrective action.

Several Halifax County residents urged the Board of Supervisors on Thursday to take immediate steps in response to a forensic audit that, they said, showed pervasive documentation problems and weak internal controls.

"Out of 398 financial transactions tested by auditors, 342 of the transactions had no supporting documentation, 49 had only partial documentation, and 7 were fully supported," said Sandra Champagne, who identified herself as a Halifax County resident during public comment and asked the board to refer the matter to the Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts.

Barbara Coleman Brown of Scottsburg told the board the absence of written policies and inconsistent recordkeeping "has dampened my regard for the governing body" and called for transparency and concrete plans for hiring, retention and documentation. Carol Tuck, another commenter, asked whether the forensic audit provided enough evidence to warrant further investigation; Premier Group advised the county to first strengthen documentation and policy foundations so subsequent reviews can be effective.

Why it matters: Citizens framed the audit findings as a trust and accountability problem that affects all taxpayers. Multiple speakers urged the board to pursue an external review and make records and policy changes visible to the public.

Board reaction: Board members acknowledged public concern and said the audit provides a roadmap for corrective actions. The board chair and county officials said they planned to prioritize adoption of written policies, Munis training and succession procedures and to consider procurement steps, including re-soliciting audit services. Officials did not commit to an immediate referral to the state auditor during the special meeting but said they would consider options and report back.

The special meeting closed after additional public comments and a motion to adjourn by voice vote. Residents in attendance said they will monitor follow-up and expect the board to present concrete timelines for the audit recommendations.