Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners deny Burlington Beach enclave annexation after homeowners oppose the transfer
Summary
Palm Beach County commissioners voted 7-0 to deny an interlocal annexation request from Burlington Beach after residents and a property owner raised concerns about taxes, property values and lack of homeowner benefit; staff had recommended approval but reported 14 of 15 property owners opposed.
The Palm Beach County Commission voted unanimously to deny a proposed interlocal agreement that would have annexed a roughly 4.6-acre enclave into the city of Burlington Beach.
Staff said the annexation was part of a larger study of annexation requests; while it met state-statutory consistency checks, staff recorded 14 of 15 property owners as opposing the proposal. Mike Slocum, a property owner on Bamboo Lane, told commissioners he had invested more than $15 million in his subdivided coastal lots and said annexation would impose higher taxes and lower values. "I bought this property with 0 understanding that another city could just say, 'oh, we'd like to annex you'," Slocum said.
Vice Mayor Woodward, whose district includes the enclave, said he had received almost unanimous opposition from landowners and moved to deny the interlocal agreement; Commissioner Flores seconded the motion. The board voted 7-0 to deny the annexation.
Staff noted the city of Burlington Beach could pursue other legal paths (legislative boundary fixes or voluntary owner consent) but that the board's denial preserves the current unincorporated status of the subject parcels.
Action: Motion to deny the Burlington Beach enclave annexation interlocal agreement (mover: Vice Mayor Woodward; second: Commissioner Flores). Outcome: carried 7-0.
