Subcommittee narrows delegation on donations, signals cautious stance on crowdfunding
Loading...
Summary
Members agreed to remove language delegating acceptance of donations and to require public reporting; administrators recommended a conservative approach to crowdfunding—bringing any platform (e.g., GoFundMe) to the board for vetting and reserving the right to refuse funds.
The subcommittee reviewed recommended edits to policy 702 on gifts, grants and donations and debated whether the board should delegate acceptance authority or keep donation acceptance at the board level. Administration said that "all of our gifts and donations do come to the board for approval" and recommended striking language that would delegate acceptance.
Committee members expressed discomfort with delegating the function and supported removal of the delegation clause. Dr. Perry noted the district keeps a historical log of donations and that maintaining public reporting obligations would not substantively change practice but would increase transparency.
Separately, members discussed crowdfunding and whether the district should preapprove specific fundraising hosts. Administration reported there is no current list of approved crowdfunding sites and recommended that any such site be vetted and approved by the board because of security and student‑data concerns. "We don't currently have a list of approved sites," Dr. Perry said, and urged careful review of any vendor that would handle funds or data. The committee favored language that allows the district to refuse funds raised via crowdfunding at its discretion and to require an administrative safety review before any approval.
The subcommittee voted to move the discussed edits forward: striking acceptance delegation language, retaining public reporting bullets and instructing administration to present guidance on vetting crowdfunding platforms for board approval.
