Bolingbrook trustees hear immigrant‑rights concerns; mayor schedules legal, community forum

Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Bolingbrook · April 1, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple residents urged the Bolingbrook board on Oct. 28 to adopt welcoming protections and called out recent ICE activity; Mayor Mary S. Alexander‑Basta urged residents to call 9‑1‑1 if they feel unsafe and announced an Oct. 30 Community Matters forum with immigration attorneys and local officials.

Residents raised concerns about recent ICE activity and pressed the Village for clearer local protections during public comment at the Oct. 28 Bolingbrook Board meeting.

Fifteen people spoke in favor of a "Welcoming City" ordinance and asked the board to support immigrant residents. Hannah Hernandez and Stephanie Vitale said village leadership had not adequately responded to an ICE incident, and Briana Jackson Webber, speaking on behalf of State Rep. Dagmara Avelar, noted legislative activity underway in Springfield to protect immigrant residents.

Trustees responded during their reports. Trustee Michael J. Carpanzano said he was disturbed by an online hostile reply to someone offering to deliver food to fearful residents and called for dignity and respect in discourse. Trustee Troy J. Doris urged continuing dialogue and strategic, lawful action. Trustee Bhavini K. Patel emphasized sharing accurate information to reduce fear.

Mayor Mary S. Alexander‑Basta, who identified herself as an immigrant during the remarks, acknowledged profiling concerns, reiterated that ICE actions are federal and outside local authority except when criminal conduct occurs, and urged residents to call 9‑1‑1 if they feel unsafe. She also announced a Community Matters forum scheduled Oct. 30 that will include the village attorney, immigration attorneys and representatives from local organizations.

No ordinance vote took place at the Oct. 28 meeting; the discussion remains at the public‑input and outreach stage.