Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utility Rates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses draft code to let owners suspend water service for long-term vacant properties, proposes $60 annual charge

Connell City Council · February 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council reviewed a proposed Connell Municipal Code amendment to allow owners of properties unoccupied for at least one year to request suspension of water service, with a proposed $60 annual fee, a $25 reconnect fee, and meter removal after three years; staff will draft formal code language for a future meeting.

Council members discussed a draft amendment to the Connell Municipal Code that would let owners of long-term unoccupied properties request suspension of water service similar to an existing sewer suspension rule. The draft, read into the record by Speaker S1, proposes a $60 yearly charge while a property remains classified as unoccupied, a full month's water charge during the month service is discontinued or restored, and a $25 reconnect fee. It also allows the city to remove meters for properties unoccupied three years or longer and treat later reconnection as a new-connection cost plus a 20% master-fee surcharge.

Speaker S1 framed the change as closing a gap: "Under the current Connell municipal code CMC 13 22 30 sewer, a resident has the ability to submit a written request to discontinue sewer service at no charge when a property is unoccupied. However, there is no similar provision within the municipal code that allows a residence to discontinue water service under the same circumstances." The drafted water provision would mirror the sewer approach while charging a modest annual fee to maintain the connection in a suspended state.

Councilmembers asked how many properties would be affected; estimates ranged from at least three to six properties now paying the minimum water bill while unoccupied. Members also raised implementation questions: create a short written form to request suspension; include a signed liability waiver stating the city is not responsible for damage such as frozen pipes after the owner requests shutoff; and clarify the minimum suspension period (the draft uses at least one year).

Officials agreed staff will convert the draft text into code-format language and bring it back to a future meeting for formal consideration. No ordinance vote occurred at the Feb. 4 meeting.