Planning commission recommends approval of ADU code amendment to align with new state laws
Loading...
Summary
The Jurupa Valley Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of Zoning Code Amendment 26001, updating local ADU and JADU rules to comply with SB 9, SB 543 and AB 1154; commissioners pressed staff for clarifications on ‘sanitation facilities,’ fee exemptions and how combined unit limits apply on single-family lots.
The Jurupa Valley Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA) 26001, a draft ordinance revising local regulations for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior ADUs (JADUs) to conform with recent state legislation.
Principal Planner Thomas Gorm summarized the required changes, saying the new state bills “establish new permitting timelines for processing applications” and revise how ADU size and fee rules are applied. He told commissioners the legislation creates a 15-day completeness check and a 60-day approval-or-denial timeline, shifts ADU square-footage limits to interior living-space measurement, allows certain combinations of ADUs and JADUs ministerially, and narrows some impact fees for smaller units.
Why it matters: The state-level changes—cited in staff materials as SB 9, SB 543 and AB 1154—limit local discretion in several areas and strengthen Housing and Community Development (HCD) review. Gorm warned commissioners that if the city’s ordinance is found noncompliant, HCD can require use of state rules in place of conflicting local provisions.
Commissioners focused on practical implications. Commissioner Fotem Dela Torre asked whether detached ADUs under the 500-square-foot school-impact-fee exemption qualify the same as attached units; Gorm replied the exemption applies based on interior livable area regardless of whether the ADU is detached or attached. Commissioners also pressed staff to clarify what constitutes “sanitation facilities” under AB 1154—whether that requires separate bathrooms, separate sewer/water connections or separate utility accounts. Gorm said the statute distinguishes interior fixtures from utility connections and that some situations (for example, installing separate sewer service) can be expensive; staff will verify utility-billing and building-code details with the city’s billing and building officials.
The proposed ordinance also notes that some ADUs and JADUs are exempt from impact fees (for ADUs of 750 sq. ft. interior living space or less and JADUs of 500 sq. ft. or less) and that small JADUs must be rented for terms longer than 30 days, per AB 1154—language intended to limit short-term rental uses.
The commission opened the public hearing, received no speaker cards or written testimony, then voted on the staff recommendation. Commissioner Fotem Dela Torre moved to approve ZCA 26001 and the CEQA exemption finding; Commissioner Pruitt seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0, forwarding the recommendation to the City Council.
Next steps: The commission’s vote sends the draft ordinance and the resolution recommending adoption to the City Council. Staff noted the ordinance is subject to HCD review after council adoption and that any HCD finding of noncompliance could require local revisions before the law takes effect.
