Heated public comment on alleged threatening letter; council members defend investigation and urge community healing

Puyallup City Council · March 25, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple public commenters questioned the city’s handling of a recent threatening-letter matter; some accused community leaders of downplaying racist threats, while several council members defended the city’s investigative steps and urged moving past the episode after the report and prosecutorial findings.

Several members of the public used the March 24 public-comment period to press the council over a high-profile threatening-letter investigation involving a former planning commission chair.

Penny Thorpe asked the council to show civic leadership on diversity and inclusion. Tim Melama and others accused community actors of amplifying false claims and of political motivation; Melama said the episode had been “perverted and co-opted” and charged that some accusations amounted to organized attempts to influence politics.

Other commenters, including Eric Schoese and Chris Chisholm, said the person targeted by the threats had been retraumatized by how the matter was handled and urged the council to withhold rhetorical certainty until facts were established. Schoese said he had not seen a written FBI report and questioned why an investigative document was presented at a prior council meeting.

Council responses were varied. Council member Castaba (former mayor) described a lengthy investigative process—subpoenas, fingerprinting, video review and interviews—and said the FBI concluded that the letter had been written by the planning commission chair or someone acting on her behalf; he urged residents to read the investigation report. Council member Gilliam and others expressed support for staff’s investigative work and emphasized that false accusations are unacceptable.

Deputy Mayor Johnson said the community had been harmed by falsehoods and cautioned against using the episode for political advantage; he also said staff remain engaged and that accountability would follow if evidence warranted. Mayor Ned Whiting called the episode “regrettable,” urged forgiveness where appropriate and encouraged the community to put the matter behind them while continuing to engage constructively.

Public commenters raised concerns about whether the city’s actions and public statements divided the community. Council members repeatedly suggested that city staff will continue to review the matter and that detailed investigative documents are available on request.