Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Government Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Director reports split council vote leaves planning commission decision intact; Tennessee Village approved by council

Redlands Planning Commission · December 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In the director's update, the city director said a Nov. 19 split City Council vote (with the mayor recused) on a Tennessee warehouse item resulted in no action—leaving the Planning Commission decision in place—and that the council approved the Tennessee Village project on Dec. 3.

Director DeSapnik updated the Planning Commission Dec. 10 on recent City Council activity affecting projects previously before the commission.

DeSapnik said the Nov. 19 council vote on a Tennessee warehouse matter was split after the mayor recused himself; because the council vote produced no majority, DeSapnik said there was no council action and the Planning Commission decision (from March/April) remains in effect. He also told commissioners the council on Dec. 3 approved the Tennessee Village project, which had come before the commission earlier and now is expected to move forward.

Commissioners asked about timing and re‑application windows for applicants whose projects were not approved by the council; DeSapnik said the code does not require a substantially different resubmittal and that an applicant generally must wait six months from the Planning Commission decision before reapplying. He said outside counsel has been retained by the City Attorney's Office to research issues related to the warehouse item and that staff will report back when that research is complete. DeSapnik did not provide a specific timetable for the outside‑counsel work.

The commission had no further action on those items at the meeting; the director said he would report back when additional information from the City Attorney's Office is available.