Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears rezone request for 1073 South Navajo Street; planning commission recommended RMF‑30 with for‑sale requirement

Salt Lake City Council (work session) · March 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council received a briefing on a request to rezone 1073 South Navajo Street from R‑1‑5000 to RMF‑30; planning staff said the lot could accommodate roughly 6–8 additional for‑sale units if developed and the planning commission recommended approval with conditions requiring retention of the existing house and owner‑occupied or for‑sale units above four.

Salt Lake City Planning staff briefed council on March 24 about a zoning map amendment request to rezone 1073 South Navajo Street from R‑1‑5000 to RMF‑30.

Austin Kimmel summarized the petition: the applicant would retain the existing two‑bedroom single‑family house on the front of the roughly 0.49‑acre parcel and subdivide the rear for additional for‑sale housing. Olivia (principal planner) said RMF‑30 allows a wider set of housing types (two‑family, row homes, cottages and multifamily with density rules based on a 2,000‑sq‑ft per unit standard) and estimated that 6–8 additional units could realistically fit behind the retained home given the lot layout; one planner estimated RMF‑30 could allow about 10 units per half‑acre in theory.

The Planning Commission voted 6–1 to forward a positive recommendation to council with the development‑agreement condition that any units over four be for‑sale and that the existing home remain on site. Council members asked whether the development agreement could require owner‑occupation for any for‑sale homes; planning staff said such a stipulation can be written into the agreement if council desires that restriction.

Councilors expressed general support for using underutilized land to increase for‑sale housing in a neighborhood with a low owner‑occupancy rate, and staff said more detailed site plans and owner‑occupation provisions would be addressed in the development agreement and later permit review.