Commission supports Libby Gate House restoration but questions proposed fence

Commissioners on March 12 generally supported the proposed rehabilitation of two objects of record at the Libby Gate House (historic landmark #18) — the Rose Arbor and brick patio — but repeatedly urged the applicant to reconsider a proposed 4‑foot fence that could interrupt the landmark’s historic open setting.

Applicant Kathy Nolan described a plan to repair the metal frame and lath of the Rose Arbor, lift and relay the brick patio with added drainage, and make several landscaping and lighting improvements (shrouded LED fixtures, 2,700K max). She also outlined proposed additions including a matching fence along Foothill, a small outdoor kitchen, five Moroccan lanterns (LED), and a modest brick fire pit.

Commissioners praised the proposed conservation work on the arbor and patio but flagged the fence as a potential visual intrusion. “I really hope those will all be restored,” one commissioner said, while another added: “I really think that the wall shouldn’t be there — it would add to the problem of the Arbolada getting blocked off.” Commissioners suggested alternatives such as a low rock wall or a visually permeable fence, asked staff to include a Mills Act analysis when the project returns as a work‑permit application, and requested clarity on setbacks because the property’s front is technically on Foothill.

Historical and archaeological notes emerged during the discussion: commissioners and a resident flagged on‑site Chumash grinding stones and other heritage features; the applicant confirmed these features will not be altered and said documentation (photographs, material samples) will be provided in the work permit package.

Next steps: The commission offered conceptual comments and instructed the applicant to return with work‑permit‑level drawings, Mills Act consistency notes and alternatives to the proposed fence for review.