Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tavern Modification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve Cadence tavern allowance over Boyd Gaming objection; debate centers on separation rules and negotiated development agreement
Summary
The commission approved a major modification to the Cadence development agreement to permit one additional tavern in the Warm Springs Village Center, with staff and the applicant emphasizing negotiated master‑plan standards and Boyd Gaming raising concerns about proximity and overconcentration of taverns; motion passed 6–1.
Staff presented a request to modify the Cadence development agreement to allow one additional tavern within the Warm Springs Village Center commercial parcel. Lee Ferris, representing the applicant (Landwell), said Cadence residents requested more full‑service restaurant options and that the tavern standards in the development agreement require a full‑service restaurant component with at least 75 dining seats separated from bar seating, nonsmoking operations and enhanced design criteria.
Erin Midby, speaking for Boyd Gaming Corporation, opposed the request and said the addition risks over‑saturation of taverns near the new Jokers Wild (Cadence Crossing Casino) project and raised concerns about two code provisions that can exempt locations from standard separation requirements. "We are opposed to this just because we have major concerns about the approval of an additional tavern," Midby said, citing potential impacts of proximate taverns on the area and on the vision for the corridor.
Applicants and staff described the modification as part of a negotiated development agreement that includes unique standards for Cadence. Lee Ferris said the developer had earlier forfeited six tavern approvals when the casino plan changed and that the current request is a measured return of one location backed by enhanced standards to support family‑oriented full‑service dining. Commissioners engaged staff on separation requirements and whether the development agreement effectively creates an exception; staff and a commissioner noted the request meets current distance separation requirements and is permitted by the negotiated agreement.
After debate the commission approved the modification by recorded vote (6–1). Commissioners agreed the commercial parcel is large and that Cadence’s rapid residential growth supports additional dining options; one commissioner voted against.
