Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessor Corrections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials approve corrections and clerical-error certificates for Oklahoma County property assessments
Summary
Participants at a meeting approved three related actions requested by the county assessor's office: attaching a list of complaints of erroneous assessments and petitions for correction, and receiving assessor certificates of clerical error and assessment. Motions were moved, seconded and approved by verbal assent recorded in the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Assessor Corrections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Participants at a meeting approved three actions related to property-assessment corrections requested by the Oklahoma County Assessor's Office.
The chair introduced Item 2 as a "discussion of possible action regarding the attachment of the list of complaints of erroneous assessment and the petition for correction," saying the item had been requested by Christie Bowen of the county assessor's office. A committee member asked whether there were changes or questions and seconded the measure; a verbal "Aye" was recorded and the motion was approved as captured in the recording.
For Item 3, the chair moved approval "on behalf of deputy assessor Christie Bowen," and a second and an "Aye" followed, after which the chair recorded approval to receive the attached Oklahoma County assessor's certificate of clerical error or import. For Item 4, the chair introduced a related certificate and certificate of assessment request (the transcript includes the variant spelling "Christy Bowen" for this request); the motion was seconded and approved by verbal assent.
All three items were described in the meeting as requests from the assessor's office to document and process clerical errors and petitions for correction in county assessment records. The transcript records the motions, seconds and single-word verbal approvals but does not provide a roll-call vote or counts beyond the affirmative responses captured.
The meeting then moved to public comment. The remarks that follow in the transcript were conversational and unrelated to the assessor items (discussion of films and informal comments); no substantive objections, appeals, or additional requests about the assessor certificates or corrections were recorded in the available transcript.
No additional procedural steps, dates for implementation, or departmental follow-ups were specified in the transcript excerpts provided.

