Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners ask staff to develop concept for new Maurice Gibb Memorial Park sign
Summary
Neighbors urged replacing a small, tombstone-like marker at Maurice Gibb Memorial Park with a music-themed welcome feature; the committee asked CIP to work with the Sunset Harbor neighborhood on a design and to refer funding to the finance committee for consideration, with design review to return to the committee by July.
Commissioners directed the city's Capital Improvements Program office to work with the Sunset Harbor Neighborhood Association to develop a realistic concept and cost estimate for a new monument sign at Maurice Gibb Memorial Park and to refer funding to the finance committee.
The move follows neighborhood complaints that the existing small monument looks like a tombstone and does not match the recently renovated park. David Gomez, director of capital improvements, told the committee that while the park renovation was completed last April and an existing monument was restored, adding or replacing a larger sign would require a conceptual design to estimate costs and schedules.
"During the process of renovating the park, which was completed in April, we did restore an existing monument sign," David Gomez said. "Adding an additional monument sign without even a conceptual at this point, it's very hard to determine the cost and related timelines." Commissioner Fernandez said residents asked for a sign that "would meet the caliber" of the new park while keeping the site's musical theme. Resident Marilyn told the committee the current marker "looks exactly like a tombstone," and urged a more emblematic, music-oriented welcome.
Commissioners discussed whether to replace the existing sign or add a second marker and debated an appropriate budget frame; one commissioner suggested a tight cap to avoid excessive cost creep. The committee approved a motion to have CIP develop a concept with the neighborhood, determine costs and what the city can deliver, and refer funding to the finance committee. Staff indicated design work could return to the committee and that funding decisions would be handled in parallel by finance, with a target to return in approximately three months (July).
The committee also noted coordination items tied to nearby infrastructure: staff said the firm moving a nearby 5G pole has obtained city permits but awaits federal regulatory approvals, which are expected in about 30 days. The committee concluded the item and left design review with the land use committee while the finance committee considers funding.
The committee took no final procurement action at the meeting; next steps are a CIP–neighborhood design process and a funding referral to finance.
