Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking And Capital Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Pierce parking committee withdraws support for vendor contract; commissioners weigh long-term 500-space garage plan
Summary
The city's parking committee voted to withdraw support for a proposed parking vendor contract after staff identified unfavorable changes. Commissioners discussed using city-controlled property for a future 500-space garage (estimated about $35,000 per space in today's dollars) and timing tied to bond retirements in the early 2030s.
The Fort Pierce parking committee recommended the City Commission withdraw support for a proposed parking vendor contract after a staff review found key contract terms had shifted and would reduce the city's income from parking revenue.
Commissioner Broderick summarized the review and said Sean (the department's interim code enforcement lead) had "done a deep dive" into the contract. Broderick said the committee voted to change its recommendation based on Sean's findings and described the altered terms as making the contract "no longer palatable." (Commissioner Broderick)
Commissioners recounted that the parking committee and staff had conducted three separate studies with similar conclusions but that one study had used privately owned property not under city control, which Broderick said was a flawed choice of potential sites. Broderick identified city-controlled property behind Second Street Bistro (the former JCPenney lot) as the only downtown parcel large enough for a garage the city controls.
On costs and timing, Broderick said the committee discussed a conceptual 500-space structure with a construction estimate of roughly $35,000 per space in today's dollars; he and other commissioners stressed the importance of integrating a garage into the city's capital-expenditure plan and noted that debt-service reductions in the early 2030s could free capacity for a major project. "We don't need another study," Broderick said, urging staff to move the matter into budgeting and engineering planning.
City staff said they would place the parking issue on a future agenda so the commission could consider whether to attempt renegotiation, to move forward with engineering and planning, or to formally kill the proposal from the vendor. The transcript did not include the vendor's responses or a final commission decision that night.
