Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Germantown board adopts zoning-code overhaul to simplify uses, tighten accessory-structure rules
Summary
On Feb. 9 the Germantown Board of Mayor and Aldermen approved zoning text amendments intended to streamline use and bulk tables, tighten accessory-structure and ADU standards, and shift some site-plan and conditional-use review to administrative processes and the planning commission.
Director Ross told the Board of Mayor and Aldermen on Feb. 9 that a package of zoning text amendments was intended to bring "clarity, consistency, and efficiency" to chapters 2, 6, 17 and 23 of the municipal code. The changes consolidate repetitive language into use and bulk tables, add modern uses, and update procedures for site-plan and conditional-use review.
The amendments create consolidated use and bulk tables so residents and applicants can read allowed uses and bulk rules by rows and columns; they also allow limited administrative adjustments to site plans (up to 10%) so some modifications need not return to the planning commission. Director Ross said the conditional-use permit process will replace the older "use on appeal" route so certain institutional users can seek planning-commission review and site-plan approval at the same time.
Residents raised concerns during the public hearing about how the code will treat fencing placed on retaining walls. Theresa Holloman told the board a practical example: "Let me just pile a bunch of dirt up, and then I'll put a 30 inch fence on top of the dirt," and asked whether the new language would allow unexpected fence heights or broaden director discretion in residential areas. Alderman Salvaggio and Director Ross both clarified that the ordinance limits accessory-structure sizes, preserves the availability of the Board of Zoning Appeals for extraordinary cases, and intends to standardize the measurement method so neighboring property impacts can be consistently assessed.
Members of the Design Review Commission said they spent significant time with staff reviewing the edits and gave unanimous support, noting the changes will allow more consistent results across neighborhoods while giving staff authority to approve straightforward applications. Board members also emphasized that the updates were the product of multiple planning-commission and DRC work sessions.
After questions and clarifications from aldermen and staff, the board voted to adopt the ordinance on second reading. The vote followed a public hearing and discussion of retaining-wall/fence measurement, accessory-dwelling-unit footprints, and administrative review thresholds.
What happens next: the new code language will be incorporated into the municipal code as adopted; residents seeking exceptions may still pursue the Board of Zoning Appeals where a variance standard is met.
