Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rental Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning board approves Rabbit Run short‑term rental with lower occupancy limit and two‑night minimum
Summary
After substantial neighborhood opposition over parking and deed‑restriction concerns, the board approved a conditional‑use permit for 3152 Cottontail Lane but amended staff conditions to cap occupancy at eight and require at least a two‑night minimum stay.
The Lexington‑Fayette County Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a conditional‑use permit for Rabbit Run LLC’s short‑term rental at 3152 Cottontail Lane after the applicant agreed to tightened conditions including a reduction in allowed guests and a two‑night minimum stay.
Applicant representative Danny Albertson noted his experience managing short‑term rentals and said the owners would follow rules and maintain communication with neighbors. Planning staff had recommended approval. Multiple neighbors voiced strong opposition during the hearing, citing the neighborhood’s deed restrictions (which they said bar commercial leasing under six months), limited street parking, safety concerns for children, and past incidents they associated with short stays.
In response to neighbors, the property manager offered concessions including reducing the maximum occupancy from 10 to 8 and instituting a two‑night minimum stay; he said Airbnb’s platform and active management would screen guests and enforce house rules. Several residents said they favored disapproval because of deed restrictions, while others who operate hosted short‑term rentals told the board they had done so without incident.
After discussion the board amended condition #2 in the staff report to read: occupancy limited to no more than eight individuals who must book at least two nights. The board moved, seconded and approved the amended conditions and the conditional‑use permit.
Board members and legal counsel also reminded residents that deed restrictions are private matters enforceable in court and not something the board resolves in this process.
