Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tomball approves TIRZ No. 3 annual report in unanimous vote
Summary
At its March 16 meeting the Tomball City Council, sitting as the TIRZ No. 3 board, approved Resolution 20 26 0 1 adopting the FY 2024–2025 Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 3 annual report; the report will be sent to local taxing authorities as required by state statute.
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Tomball City Council, sitting as the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 3 board, approved Resolution 20 26 0 1 adopting the FY 2024–2025 TIRZ No. 3 annual report during its March 16, 2026 meeting. The motion passed by hand vote, 5-0.
A staff member explained that the action is the annual adoption of the TIRZ No. 3 report and said it “will then be disseminated out to all the local taxing authorities as required by state statute.” The mayor asked for a motion; a councilmember moved and another seconded. The council voted verbally and by hand; the mayor announced the ayes and a council member confirmed there were no nays.
Earlier in the meeting a councilmember asked the mayor to open the concurrent board meeting for the tourist/TIRZ item; the record uses variant acronyms in places, but the item before the council was the Tomball Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 3 annual report for FY 2024–2025. One councilmember apologized for agenda confusion before the board portion was adjourned.
The resolution was described in the record as “resolution 20 26 0 1” enacting the 2024–2025 TIRZ No. 3 annual report; the transcript presents that numeric string with spacing as quoted above. According to the staff explanation, adoption of the report fulfills the requirement to distribute the annual report to affected taxing jurisdictions under state statute.
The council closed the TIRZ board portion of the session after the vote. No individual mover or seconder was identified in the public record excerpts provided; the vote tally was recorded as five ayes, zero nays.

