Dickinson County supervisors set general levy at 1.9% after debate over rates
Loading...
Summary
After extended debate about growth, valuations and fiscal prudence, the Dickinson County Board of Supervisors voted to set the county general levy at 1.9 and the rural levy at 1.7. The decision followed arguments about using surplus funds versus preserving reserve levels required for federal loan eligibility.
The Dickinson County Board of Supervisors voted to set the county general levy at 1.9 and the rural levy at 1.7 after a lengthy discussion about valuation-driven automatic levy reductions, budget surpluses and inflationary pressures.
The board considered several proposals and scenarios before the vote. Supervisor Levi argued that the county should ‘‘spend it down’’ from a surplus and plan for continued growth, saying the county should consider ‘‘another 3% decrease next year at minimum, and that needs to be considered today.'’ Other members cautioned that lowering levies too far could jeopardize the county's ability to qualify for federal loans and could leave departments exposed to inflation-driven cost increases. The chair referenced the county auditor Laurie's guidance recommending a 2% general levy as feasible but tight.
After debate, a motion to set the general levy at 1.9 and keep the rural levy at 1.7 was moved and seconded and passed by roll call; several supervisors recorded aye votes and one supervisor recorded a no vote. The board chair cast an aye and the motion carried.
Why it matters: Property valuations affect how much tax revenue the county collects and interact with state-level formulas (House File 718) that can automatically reduce levies as valuations rise. Board members said the decision balances taxpayer relief with the county's need to preserve reserves for infrastructure and potential federal borrowing.
What happens next: The levy rates set by the board will be incorporated into the county budget process and noted for the upcoming public hearings and statutory filings. No further readings were required on the levy motion.

