Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Harrison County moves forward on animal control facility design, tables site decision

Harrison County Commission · March 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extensive debate over multiple candidate parcels, the commission directed the county's engineering firm to produce an updated design for an animal control shelter at the drive-in/parking area site and tabled the separate land‑purchase decision to allow environmental review and coordination.

Commissioners spent significant time on March 4 weighing options for a new Harrison County animal control facility, a project discussed by county officials and commissioners as a multi-year priority.

Staff identified three candidate locations: a Meadowbrook Road parcel that satisfied RFP requirements (4.23 acres), an 11-acre Route 19 parcel with utilities that previously attracted county investment, and an Ellis Drive parcel near a flea-market area. Commissioners debated environmental review needs, utility availability, impact on existing uses, and the timeline for construction. One commissioner urged moving immediately to build where land is developable; others recommended completing site engineering and environmental assessments first to avoid wasted expense and to protect wetlands and wildlife.

The commission voted to table the specific land‑purchase decision (item 15) to allow staff analysis, then approved a separate motion directing the engineering firm McKinley to update the animal control facility design for the drive‑in/theater parking area site and to return with a timeline for start and completion. The motion passed by voice vote.

What this means: The commission signaled intent to advance design work while pausing a final land acquisition until environmental and planning steps are complete. Funding sources discussed included ARPA and existing county budgets; commissioners noted potential deadlines tied to grant windows.