Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent alleges legal settlements and NDAs to silence disability complaints; other commenters raise conduct and inclusion concerns
Summary
During public comment, a parent alleged PWCS spent large sums on legal fees and offered $20,000 and an NDA to settle disability‑related complaints; another parent asked the board to review a coach's social media conduct. Comments on Gender identity emerged in a separate public comment.
During the citizen comment period, several speakers raised concerns ranging from alleged legal settlements to staff conduct and inclusion.
Dr. Kimberly Melman Orozco told the board she had been offered $20,000 and a nondisclosure agreement to drop complaints she and her family raised alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. "Most people in this audience didn't really catch when you guys had adopted all unanimously the legal recommendations... you're spending millions of dollars on attorney's fees covering up your systemic violations," she said. Melman Orozco said she had recorded conversations and plans to post those recordings online. The board had earlier adopted legal recommendations in closed session; no board member offered a direct factual rebuttal to her allegations during public comment.
Carlesha Harris asked the board to investigate conduct by a boys varsity coach who unfollowed her son on social media after her husband previously spoke to the board. Harris said the coach reposted a reel that contained racial slurs and other offensive language visible to students, and she asked the board to review whether staff actions complied with PWCS social‑media and professional boundaries policies.
Other commenters included Monanne Davis, who spoke in support of the FY2027 proposed budget and called for continued work toward universal pre‑K, and Marty Weaver, who used the public‑comment time to contest recognition language around Women’s History Month and oppose recognition of transgender women. Weaver’s remarks criticized the board’s approach to gender identity and drew no formal response from the board during the comment period.
The board did not take immediate action on the specific allegations presented during citizen comment; officials noted general procedures for handling personnel and legal matters and had earlier authorized legal recommendations in closed session. Concerned parties may pursue formal complaints with the appropriate division offices or with legal counsel if they seek further action.
