Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves setback variance for small lot despite neighbor objections

City of Henderson Planning Commission · October 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a variance reducing interior side‑yard setbacks from 5 feet to 3 feet for a single‑family lot in an RS6 zone. Neighbors argued the lot is too small and the change would alter neighborhood character; commissioners noted the proposed 30‑foot building height is within the 35‑foot allowance.

The Henderson Planning Commission approved a variance request to reduce interior side‑yard setbacks from 5 feet to 3 feet for a single‑family residence near Evelyn Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard, despite objections from nearby homeowners.

Neighbor Tiffany Sewer (ZIP 89011) told the commission the lot in question is “only about 2,000 square feet,” far below the 6,000‑square‑foot minimum for RS6 zoning, and urged the panel to deny the variance because it would set a precedent and harm neighborhood character. "Allowing a 3‑story structure squeezed in a 25‑foot wide lot completely changes the look and the feel of our street," she said, adding concerns about privacy, property values and safety.

Staff clarified that the allowed height in the area is 35 feet and the proposed dwelling would be 30 feet tall, placing it within zoning limits. Commissioners asked about easements and whether neighbors had been contacted; the applicant said they attempted outreach but could not reach all property owners. One commissioner noted the housing shortage and said the narrow lot configuration made strict setback requirements hard to work with.

Commissioner Lewis moved to approve VA2025017447, citing the practical difficulties of development on the long‑standing small lot. The motion passed; the transcript records the item passing "with 2 noes" but does not list individual vote names.

What happens next: The item was approved by the Planning Commission. Any appeals or final permits will proceed through standard administrative channels and the building permit stage will address easement and fire/safety requirements.

Provenance: Item introduced at Item 18 and discussed with public testimony from Tiffany Sewer and staff clarifications before the motion and vote.