Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Livestock topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors raise biosecurity concerns as county reviews swine finishing barn variance
Summary
An applicant proposed a swine finishing barn near Hatfield; neighbors and the county planning staff discussed disease spread, setbacks and that county ordinance lacks site-to-site setback rules. Staff suggested the comp-plan update could examine changes.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Livestock topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
An applicant seeking to build a swine finishing barn in the northeast corner of Section 31 presented plans to the Pipestone County board; staff said the board of adjustments previously granted a variance allowing construction closer than one mile to city limits.
At the meeting staff described the proposed location and regulatory background: the countyordinance sets a quarter-mile setback from residences for sites up to a defined animal-unit threshold and combines sites within 500 feet for animal-unit totals. Staff noted the ordinance does not include a site-to-site setback standard and said that, during the variance hearing, neighbors raised proximity and biosecurity concerns.
A neighbor, Heidi Law, said the proximity to her finishing operation raised disease-control risks. "They can travel miles; I've talked to two different veterinarians and they are more comfortable with hogs three-quarters of a mile away from our operation," she said, urging greater separation and suggesting alternative placement farther from existing facilities.
Staff answered technical questions from the board about disease pathways and odor controls and said modern odor-control enzymes and pit management can reduce odor but do not fully eliminate biosecurity risks. Planning staff recommended the county consider the issue as part of the upcoming comprehensive plan and ordinance review rather than retroactively changing a variance already approved by the board of adjustments.
There was no permit action taken at the board meeting; the conversation focused on public input and whether future ordinance updates should address site-to-site setbacks and disease mitigation measures.
Next steps: staff suggested the comp-plan update as the forum to evaluate potential ordinance changes; concerned neighbors were advised to continue dialog with the applicant and the countyplanning office.

