Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines comprehensive plan review, flags slower-than-expected growth and options to boost housing density
Summary
Planning staff reviewed the city's comprehensive plan, saying population growth has lagged earlier projections (current estimate ~9,100 vs. a 2025 projection of ~11,000). The presentation covered land-use designations, infrastructure limits (especially sewer), infill preference, and tools such as density increases and accessory dwelling units for future housing supply.
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff provided an overview of the city's comprehensive plan and led a discussion on growth, land use and housing choices that could be explored as part of the plan update.
Staff described the comp plan as a 20-year vision and noted prior population projections: the plan originally envisioned 13,000 residents by 2040 and roughly 11,000 by 2025, but staff said quick-census estimates currently place Augusta's population at about 9,100. "So we're not quite on target to meet those population growth expectations," staff said, and the shortfall means service and land-use needs may be lower than originally anticipated unless development pressure changes, such as if US 54 west opens and triggers new demand.
The presentation reviewed future land-use categories by corridor: US 54 west and east, US 77, and North Ohio, and emphasized maintaining industrial districts near rail and highways while locating lower-intensity commercial and residential uses away from major corridors. Staff reiterated a preference for infill development where feasible and noted the high cost of extending utilities beyond existing city limits, especially sewer expansion.
Commissioners asked about available acreage for expansion, the status of a development at David and Ohio (staff said the project is proceeding and would appear on the council agenda), and policy tools to increase housing density such as incremental zoning changes and accessory dwelling units. Staff said additional analysis could be prepared on density changes, lot-coverage rules, ADU policy and potential incentives; no formal policy changes were approved at the meeting.
What happens next: Staff offered to prepare follow-up materials and potential code-change options for commissioners to consider; the comp plan items will be revisited in future meetings. No formal action was taken during this session.

