Commission approves call-center contract, settles two stipulations and waives a late-filing fine

Florida Commission on Ethics · March 10, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a renewal call-center contract with ROICX at $164,728.52, adopted two joint stipulations imposing fines and public censure, and waived a $1,500 late-filing fine for an appellant citing agency closure and delivery errors.

The Florida Commission on Ethics approved several administrative items including a call-center contract renewal, two joint stipulations resolving probable-cause matters and staff recommendations on filing-fine appeals.

Executive Director Stillman presented a renewal contract with ROICX to operate the commissioncall center supporting CE Form 1 filers. She told commissioners the renewal price is $164,728.52 for the May 1toAug 28 term and noted prior-year cost savings (last year's contracted amount was $262,416, with actual realized cost about $173,462.91). The commission authorized staff to execute the contract and associated expenditure from carry-forward budget dollars.

On enforcement matters, staff presented and the commission approved a joint stipulation in complaint 22-116 (Enri Paul Billard) that dismissed three allegations and imposed a $500 civil penalty and public censure for failing to certify completion of ethics training on Form 1. Separately, staff presented a joint stipulation in complaint 25-034 involving a Gaston County commissioner that resolved a conflict-of-interest allegation with a $1,500 civil penalty plus public censure and reprimand; commissioners approved the stipulation.

In an appeal (FD21029) brought by an appellant who serves on a local trust board, staff recommended and commissioners approved waiving a $1,500 automatic fine for a late 2020 filing because the appellant's agency offices had been closed during COVID-19, notices may have been misdelivered, and the appellant had mobility and cognitive limitations; staff recommended waiving the assessed fine as an "unusual circumstance." Commissioners also adopted staff recommendations on several other no-hearing appeals as a group and declared one financial-disclosure fine uncollectible where the filer had died.

Next steps: staff will execute the call-center contract and proceed with outreach; staff will also post final orders and update filing-coordinator procedures where appropriate.