Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee examines tiny homes and short-term rentals as housing tools; neighbors press enforcement
Summary
Planning staff briefed the committee on zoning and building-code limits for tiny homes and described Topeka's short-term rental categories; neighborhood residents raised concerns about notification, absentee ownership and noise, and councilmembers asked staff to research registries and spacing rules.
City planning staff told the Policy and Finance Committee that Topeka’s current zoning and building codes allow some tiny houses but constrain factory-built tiny homes unless they meet state "residential design manufactured home" standards (for example, minimum width and other HUD/manufactured-home requirements). Dan Warner of the Planning and Development Department said tiny homes built on-site and meeting the International Residential Code are permitted in residential districts, but factory-built units that are narrower than the city’s residential-design manufactured-home standard would require zoning changes or a rezoning process.
Warner said the city has allowed accessory dwelling units and other measures in recent years and that larger tiny-home developments would likely require a rezoning or planned-unit-development (PUD) process.
On short-term rentals, Warner summarized the city’s three STR permit types (Type 1 — owner-hosted, Type 2 — non-hosted up to five bedrooms, Type 3 — six or more bedrooms/bed-and-breakfast style). Staff said planning has approved about 190 STR permits since 2021 and currently tracks roughly 75 Type 1/2 permits; some short-term lodging in zoning districts that don’t require permits may not be tracked.
Residents and committee members raised enforcement and neighborhood-notification concerns. Christine Stankler, a neighbor who said she listed her house on the National Register of Historic Places, described receiving a one-line notice that a next-door property was being used as an Airbnb and said absentee out-of-state ownership has left neighbors without reliable local contacts when problems arise. “There are people who come late at night... you have more cars, you have more noise,” Stankler said, calling for clearer notification and contact expectations for absentee owners.
Councilmembers asked staff to compare other cities’ practices on STR spacing, mid-term compliance checks and possible registry options. City Manager Perez acknowledged the concerns and said staff would look into payment options, compliance and a potential rental-registry concept.
Next steps: Staff will check other cities’ practices on tiny-home policy and short-term rental spacing and enforcement, and return with possible code or zoning amendments and implementation options.
