Cumberland committee approves superintendent's proposed FY27 budget 4—3 after debate over position cuts
Loading...
Summary
After extended discussion over proposed staff reductions (including four "essentials" positions and a 0.5 interventionist), the Cumberland School Committee approved the superintendent's proposed fiscal year 2026—27 budget on a 4—3 vote. Committee members warned deeper town funding cuts could force steeper reductions.
The Cumberland School Committee voted 4 to 3 to approve Superintendent Dr. Thornton's proposed fiscal year 2026—27 budget after a lengthy debate about which positions might be cut to meet projected revenue shortfalls.
"I don't want to do that, and I think most people at this table, if not all, would agree with that," the chair said, describing the difficulty of choosing reductions and the committee's reluctance to cut staff. Dr. Thornton outlined a staffing "concentric circles" framework, saying the district serves more than 5,000 students and that his recommendation includes possible reductions such as four "essentials" positions, a 0.5 interventionist for reading, and selective retirements or unfilled positions to yield roughly $300,000 in breakage savings.
Assistant Superintendent Tony DeMana explained the instructional difference between the roles under discussion: "essentials" provide tier-2 support and typically reach 15 to 20 students per position, while interventionists (tier 3) work with small groups (six students across multiple periods) and can serve up to 36 students. "For every interventionist that is cut, it takes away the ability for a school to service up to 36 students," he said.
Several committee members said they were uncomfortable singling out those positions. "I don't feel comfortable that we should be putting them at the forefront of what potentially could be the cuts," said Miss Smith, who warned reductions would be particularly detrimental at McCourt Middle School. Mr. Dean urged members to press town officials for more funding, saying the budget being submitted assumed the district would receive the maximum local increase available under statute.
The motion to approve the superintendent's budget was made by Miss Feather and seconded by Miss Goldstein. The vote passed 4 to 3; the record shows three members voted against the motion and asked the administration to continue seeking alternative reductions and to pursue further discussions with the town.
Why it matters: Committee and administration leaders said the district must present a number to the mayor by April 6; the level of town support will determine whether more positions are ultimately cut or partially recalled. Committee members emphasized that some reductions are likely, but they debated whether administrative roles, course sections or newly created positions should be prioritized over classroom-facing staff.
Votes at a glance: - Motion to approve superintendent's proposed FY27 budget — Mover: Miss Feather; Second: Miss Goldstein; Outcome: Approved 4—3. - Motion to approve consent agenda (earlier) — Mover: Miss Smith; Second: Miss Feather; Outcome: Approved 7—0. - Motion to approve payment of bills ($138,851.69) — Mover: Miss Smith; Second: Mr. Dean; Outcome: Approved 7—0.
What's next: Administrators said the committee may schedule additional budget workshops if needed as town funding details become clearer. The district will finalize required staffing notices and the layoff matrix according to the timing set by policy and state deadlines.
