Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Lawmakers hear detailed testimony on bill to end pediatric hospital overstays and speed placements
Loading...
Summary
The House Appropriations Committee heard extensive testimony backing HB 1559 and related measures to stop placing children in hotels and other unlicensed settings, build a statewide bed registry and rapid‑response placement teams, and streamline voluntary placement agreements (VPAs). Hospitals, advocates and state agencies urged new accountability and data systems while warning capacity remains a constraint.
Lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee heard urgent testimony on HB 1559 on Tuesday, a measure intended to end the practice of keeping youth in hospitals and other unlicensed settings while they await placement.
The bill, introduced by the chamber’s speaker (presenting the bill in committee), would prohibit placements of children in hotels, homeless shelters and office buildings and establish a placement review panel, a rapid‑response team and a placement manager (or senior adviser role) to coordinate state agencies. It also requires standardized data collection and a statewide bed registry to track available placements across residential, therapeutic foster and step‑down programs.
Supporters told the committee that children routinely spend weeks or months in emergency departments or hospital rooms after being medically cleared, often losing access to school, outdoor time and essential social supports. "I waited with this mother and son for 15 hours," the bill sponsor said, recounting a case that prompted the legislation and describing the emotional toll on families. Hospital clinicians and system leaders offered specific examples: a pediatric patient who spent 81 days in hospital after discharge and another who remained more than 100 days while a placement was found.
Representatives of Johns Hopkins Children’s Center and the University of Maryland Medical System described how overstays reduce available acute beds, delay care for medically fragile patients and worsen mental‑health outcomes for the children involved. "We have failed these children," Johns Hopkins’ chief medical officer said, urging the committee to create structures to move children promptly to appropriate settings.
Advocates and legal partners testified that HB 1559 incorporates recommendations from last year’s interagency work group on unlicensed settings and pediatric overstays. Disability Rights Maryland and other child‑welfare advocates supported mandatory reporting, data transparency and timelines, while acknowledging the bill won’t create beds overnight: "Without an increase in community placements… hospital overstays will continue," counsel from Disability Rights Maryland said.
State agencies generally supported the bill with amendments. The Department of Human Services told lawmakers it had already eliminated hotel placements, increased kinship placements by 33 percent and reduced hospital overstays by 65 percent compared with prior years, and asked to coordinate implementation details. The Maryland Department of Health described existing pilots (a step‑down stabilization program and an online bed registry called BRRS) and said it is expanding capacity, including adding dedicated beds financed in last year’s budget.
Several witnesses emphasized the need for enforceable timelines, centralized data and ongoing interagency coordination. Hospital leaders requested clarity about responsibilities during the period between medical discharge and legal custody or placement, and urged operational support for a statewide referral and tracking platform.
HB 1559 is paired in committee with two related bills that address procedural drivers of overstays: HB 11 81 (voluntary placement agreement reforms) expedites and clarifies VPA timelines and removes requirements that families exhaust all community services before a VPA is approved; HB 11 81 also includes provisions to ease financial burdens for families (child‑support adjustments) and to allow partial custody alternatives so families need not surrender full custody to obtain needed treatment.
Advocates argued these procedural fixes will reduce delays that currently force families to choose between surrendering custody or leaving a child in a hospital. A clinical operations leader described frequent delays in scheduling Local Care Team meetings and said setting enforceable deadlines will prevent administrative drift that leaves children hospitalized longer than medically necessary.
Committee members acknowledged the bill’s promise but pressed witnesses about capacity: several asked whether timelines and data systems would be enough without new placements and funding. Agency witnesses and the Governor’s Office for Children said additional procurements and capacity expansions are underway and that interagency amendments can reduce the bill’s fiscal note.
The committee did not take a final vote; the sponsor asked to form a small cross‑committee work group to refine amendments with health and appropriations members. The legislation remains under committee consideration pending technical and fiscal changes.
Next steps: the committee will consider amendments to align the placement manager role, reconcile fiscal assumptions about existing registries and coordinate implementation timelines across MDH and DHS.
