Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Research Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel debates $50M proposal to shore up university research after federal cuts

Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers debated S.B. 428, a proposal to set aside $50 million to support research at Connecticut institutions after federal funding shifts; sponsors warned of large research shortfalls at UConn and economic impacts, while some members objected to the timing and fiscal size of the appropriation.

Representative Dott introduced S.B. 428, a proposal to create a $50 million state fund and an academic review team to prioritize research projects at Connecticut higher-education institutions that face diminished federal funding. Dott said changes at the federal level have led to grant terminations: "At UConn alone, that has led, directly to $53,000,000 of terminated grants" and possibly a larger $100,000,000 reduction in federal research funding when ongoing nonrenewals are counted.

Dott told the committee the bill would target applications that cannot be funded through existing federal channels to maximize the state's return and preserve local economic activity tied to research. He said UConn estimates about $700,000,000 in economic activity related to research across towns and that research funding supports thousands of jobs.

Representative Branca opposed the $50 million appropriation in the current budget window as fiscally imprudent and asked that the committee record votes by name. The clerk called a roll on the referral to Appropriations and several members’ votes were recorded; Chair Slapp left votes open until 02:30 to allow members to record their votes.

The committee’s exchange highlighted both the potential economic importance of preserving research funding and the competing pressures of a constrained state budget. S.B. 428 was referred JF 2 Appropriations and the roll call remained open.