Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Reclamation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies Reeves borrow‑pit renewal after extended public concern over reclamation and road impacts
Summary
After hours of staff presentations, engineer testimony and sustained public comment raising reclamation, mosquito and road‑damage concerns, the board denied the Reeves/Rio Barro borrow‑pit renewal and extension request for excavation and clay removal.
The board denied a renewal and extension request for excavation and clay‑borrowing operations on multiple Reeves parcels, including contingent Rio Barro acreage, after extensive staff presentation, a county‑engineer review and widespread public comment focused on incomplete reclamation, standing water, mosquito breeding, and potential damage to recently rebuilt county roads.
Planning staff (speaker 11) summarized Application BZA‑202611, which would have authorized excavation on roughly 12.2 acres of the Reeves property as part of a 78.5‑acre operation and a contingent 9.11‑acre Rio Barro parcel. County engineer Mike (speaker 28) presented aerial and drone imagery showing active excavation areas, previous work, and partial reclamation. Staff described the site as having seen piecemeal excavation over a decade and noted topsoil shortages that limited effective hydroseeding in some areas; stormwater inspector John Cortez (speaker 3) said topsoil set aside for reclamation had been used and that more material may be required to achieve typical reclamation standards.
Attorney Murphy Goodman (speaker 21) represented the applicants and said a contingent purchase of the Rio Barro parcel would allow Reeves to complete necessary work and sell clay to the adjacent Republic landfill, reducing truck trips on public roads. Goodman said new contractors are in place and that additional surety and closer oversight were proposed.
Many neighbors and elected officials spoke, citing prior promises to reclaim areas before new excavation, concerns about ponds of standing water breeding mosquitoes, visible bare soils described by some as a "moonscape," trucking across a road that has since been annexed by Murfreesboro, and insufficient prior reclamation. Commenters urged the board to require completion of reclamation commitments before approving additional disturbance.
A board member moved to deny the application citing public‑health and safety risks, ongoing heavy equipment presence beyond prior deadlines, lack of city authorization for extensive use of a now‑annexed city road, and incomplete reclamation. The motion passed on roll call; staff said the county holds surety and could use those funds if required to complete reclamation work.
