Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Village board approves 7 Brew drive‑thru development agreement at 4380 W. Brown Deer Road
Summary
The Village of Brown Deer approved a development agreement allowing a 7 Brew drive‑thru at 4380 W. Brown Deer Road after discussing screening, snow storage and three negotiated exceptions to code. Trustees kept the one‑year review clause in place and approved the agreement with the staff‑requested changes.
The Village of Brown Deer voted to approve a development agreement that clears the way for a 7 Brew drive‑thru at 4380 West Brown Deer Road.
The board heard from planning staff and the developer about site circulation, dumpster placement, temporary snow storage and design details. Staff said the Planning Commission recommended approval but noted three requested changes to typical development conditions: applicant‑requested removal of the routine one‑year review (the board later retained that review), a proposed outdoor speaker decibel allowance raised from 70 to 77 decibels, and an exception to allow two sandwich‑board style signs in the drive‑thru aisle where the code normally prohibits them.
Nate Piotrowski, a village planning staff member, summarized the Planning Commission's review and the three items in the development agreement that drew attention. Piotrowski said the commission did not formally require additional screening but asked the applicant to work with staff and the beautification committee on vegetation or fencing along the north and east edges of the site.
Kevin Schmoldt of 7 Group described how the operation will use a double drive‑thru circulation pattern and said the company has designed the site to manage truck circulation and provide a dumpster corral at the northeast corner of the lot. Schmoldt acknowledged neighbors' concerns about headlights and noise and said the company is working with an engineer on hardscaping, denser vegetation and fencing to reduce light and noise impacts.
During public comment, a nearby resident urged the board to reject the proposal on the grounds that headlights, light and noise would intrude on adjacent apartment units and questioned where snow and trash would be handled.
Trustees discussed whether to accept all of the applicant's requested exceptions. A motion to approve the development agreement, with the staff‑presented adjustments but keeping the one‑year review provision in place, passed; the transcript records the motion carried.
The board directed staff to continue work with the applicant and the beautification committee on screening and site details before final implementation.
