Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Skokie Plan Commission delays decision on accessory-dwelling-unit rules until May 7
Summary
The Plan Commission continued consideration of zoning changes for accessory dwelling units (case 2025-21P) to the May 7 agenda after staff presented a sample-block feasibility analysis showing roughly half of lots might qualify; commissioners debated whether to wait for state guidance before adopting a local rule.
Get email alerts on the Adus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Skokie Plan Commission on Monday continued its review of proposed zoning changes for accessory dwelling units, voting to place case 2025-21P on the May 7 agenda for further consideration.
Justin Malone of the Village of Skokie's Community Development Department told commissioners that staff analyzed three sample blocks to estimate lot coverage and ADU eligibility. Malone said the limited sample suggested "about 50%" of homes in the three-block sample would qualify under the draft lot-coverage standards, and that a comprehensive parcel-by-parcel inventory would take more time and better Cook County/GIS data.
The matter prompted debate among commissioners about whether Skokie should adopt local regulations now or wait for the state legislature to act. Commissioner Wittry urged caution, saying the Commission should "give the state an opportunity to speak here because we're acting in the dark." Staff and other commissioners countered that municipalities are receiving updates from regional partners and that a local regulation could be implemented immediately, though it might need revision if state law later conflicts.
Commissioner Gavariejo moved to amend an earlier motion to continue the case to September and instead continue the matter to May 7; the amendment was seconded and passed on an individual roll call. The continuance places the ADU zoning discussion back on the Plan Commission agenda for May 7 for additional review and possible action.
No formal regulations were adopted at the meeting. The Plan Commission is advisory; any recommendation it makes would still go to the Village Board for final action if the Commission forwards a proposal.

