Val Verde County votes unanimously to intervene in Howard Solstice transmission-line case, allocates $25,000
Loading...
Summary
After three hours of testimony from landowners and scientists, the Val Verde County Commissioners Court voted 5-0 to intervene in the Public Utilities Commission proceeding over AEP's Howard Solstice transmission line and to set aside an initial $25,000 for the county's participation; speakers cited risks to karst geology, groundwater and scenic resources.
The Val Verde County Commissioners Court voted unanimously to intervene in the administrative proceeding over the Howard Solstice transmission line and set aside an initial $25,000 to support the county's participation, County Judge Louis G. Owens said. Commissioners made the decision after more than two hours of public comment and presentations that highlighted environmental, cultural and economic concerns tied to the utility's preferred Route 4.
Tom Keller, who delivered slides on behalf of affected property owners and presented a petition, urged the court to act quickly: “The preferred route loves Val Verde County more than any other county in Texas,” he said, noting the route would run roughly 100 miles in Val Verde County and require a cleared corridor about 200 feet wide with lattice towers taller than 160 feet.
Speakers at the public comment period described a range of potential harms. Bob Tierney, a landowner and agricultural consultant, warned that the county's karst geology makes sites for deep tower footings risky for groundwater and sinkholes and urged the county to require core sampling, engineering documentation, performance bonds and an end-of-life decommissioning plan from the utility. "We have 640 in Val Verde County," Tierney said when recounting mapped karst features.
Clay Kartal, another landowner, urged formal intervention so the county would have standing in the Public Utilities Commission process and the ability to press alternative routes. "I respectfully urge you to intervene in this project on behalf of all of the citizens of Val Verde County," he said, arguing that the project could reduce property values, harm ranching and ecotourism, and require extensive drilling and concrete pours in fragile limestone terrain.
Commissioners asked legal and practical questions before voting. The county attorney explained that formally intervening would make the county a party to the case and could require participation in discovery and other litigation tasks, but that the county could later withdraw or be removed for lack of participation. "As an intervener, you're basically a party and you have to participate," the county attorney said, noting discovery obligations but also confirming the county could opt out later if necessary.
Several commissioners expressed concern about potential costs and the risk of the county becoming deeply engaged in litigation. The court discussed setting aside contingency funds at the outset so the county attorney's office could begin the filing and early work. After debate, the court voted, by roll call, 5-0 to intervene and to allocate an initial $25,000 for the effort; Commissioner Vasquez made the motion and Commissioner Wardlaw seconded it.
The action directs the county attorney to file the paperwork required to become an intervener in the Public Utilities Commission administrative hearing and to deliver an updated protest letter. County officials and landowners said the deadline to file for intervener status is imminent, and presenters asked the court to augment earlier protest letters with the county's formal participation.
No representatives of the utility (AEP) were on the record at the meeting to respond to the local complaints. Speakers cited AEP filings and the company's route maps in making several technical claims, including that the preferred route could allow communications infrastructure and ancillary uses that could change land use in the future; those assertions were not rebutted in the meeting.
The court also addressed routine county business at the same meeting, including a proclamation recognizing April as Child Abuse Prevention Month and multiple procurement and facilities items that passed unanimously.
Votes at a glance - Motion: Authorize Val Verde County to intervene in the Public Utilities Commission proceeding concerning the Howard Solstice transmission line and set aside an initial $25,000 for participation. Mover: Commissioner Vasquez. Second: Commissioner Wardlaw. Vote: 5-0 (approved).
What happens next County staff said the county attorney's office will file the intervention paperwork before the regulatory deadline and prepare an amended protest/protest letter to the PUC. Landowners who spoke said they will continue to supply engineering and property data to the county and be available to assist legal efforts.
