House testimony splits over bill to penalize foreign seizures of U.S. assets
Loading...
Summary
H.R.70‑84, the Defending American Property Abroad Act, would allow the president to bar vessels that called at ports that unlawfully seized American property; supporters called it a needed protection for U.S. firms, while critics said it would unduly expand Coast Guard duties and could raise costs for Americans.
Representative Ezell, sponsor of H.R.70‑84, summarized the bill as a targeted measure to hold governments in the Western Hemisphere accountable when they nationalize or seize American assets, giving the president authority to deny entry to vessels that called at offending ports until restitution or compensation is provided.
In questioning, Ranking Member Larson cautioned that enforcing such designations could add to Coast Guard burdens and might have economic side effects; he offered an amendment to require a presidential certification that using these authorities would not increase costs for everyday Americans. Larson and other critics said diplomacy and trade remedies could be better tools than the bill’s proposed maritime restrictions.
Ezell and supporters said the legislation protects American industries and would be applied narrowly; Larson said the Coast Guard is already stretched and the committee should avoid adding open‑ended duties without certification of economic impacts. The Rules Committee included H.R.70‑84 in the rule package for floor consideration under a closed rule.
