Board debates hiring interventionists and coaches as student cohort needs grow

Shippensburg Area School District Board (Committee of the Whole then Planning & Action) · March 24, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Administrators urged adding interventionists and coaching capacity to address cohorts affected by COVID-era learning loss and rising special-education needs; the board discussed cost tradeoffs, scheduling challenges and whether to prioritize coaches (tier‑1) or interventionists (tier‑2).

Administrators and the Student Services committee pressed the board to consider additional interventionists and instructional coaches to address learning gaps among students now in grades 5–8 who were in primary grades during the pandemic. The administration said the personnel request list for 26–27 includes roughly $650,000 in new positions and that special‑education placement costs and transportation are also upward drivers.

Board members debated options and evidence for middle‑school supports. One board member summarized the tradeoff: coaching strengthens tier‑1 instruction districtwide, while interventionists provide targeted “double‑dosing” for students who have fallen behind. The administration described MTSS (multi‑tiered systems of support) work at elementary levels and said middle‑school scheduling and identification of students would determine how many intervention positions are needed.

Estimates discussed at the meeting suggested adding two full‑time interventionists could cost roughly $200,000 annually, while a larger multi‑year intervention and coaching buildout could approach $900,000 in the first year. Board members asked for data to identify how many students would require services and whether positions could be phased; administrators said they would return with targeted counts and models.

Doctor Donat (instructional leadership referenced in the discussion) and others were cited as supporting a mixed approach: strengthen tier‑1 instruction through coaching while deploying interventionists where data indicate persistent deficits. The board did not make a hiring commitment on March 23 but asked that staffing scenarios and student‑identification data be brought back at the next budget meeting.