Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sidewalk Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alameda council introduces revised sidewalk-repair ordinance, removes special-assessment lien option

Alameda City Council · March 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Alameda on March 3 introduced an amended municipal-code ordinance to formalize a city-run sidewalk-repair program and financial-assistance options, removing a property special-assessment (lien) enforcement mechanism and relying instead on an adopted collections policy; second reading is set for March 17.

The Alameda City Council introduced a revised ordinance on March 3 that would revise how the city handles sidewalk repairs and delinquent accounts, removing a special-assessment (lien) enforcement mechanism and relying exclusively on the city’s collections policy.

Public Works Director Erin Smith told the council the revised ordinance codifies the city’s pilot sidewalk program — which offers temporary shaving repairs for tripping hazards, tree-caused sidewalk replacement by the city, and a city-performed-repair option for owners — and expands financial-assistance and payment-plan options. "Over 70% of property owners notified elect the city to do the work," Smith said, citing high take-up of the city-performed option.

Smith said the version before the council is a response to direction given at a January meeting and is narrower than the earlier proposal, specifically eliminating the proposed special-assessment enforcement mechanism. "The ordinance before you this evening removes the additional enforcement mechanism, which includes placing a special assessment on a property to recover any costs due to the city," Smith said, and noted the council had already adopted a separate collections policy on Jan. 6.

Council member Dasoc asked why the ordinance does not memorialize a formal "meet-and-confer" step before collections proceed. Smith replied that the meet-and-confer language was never codified in the January draft and that the adopted collections policy contains a more-detailed, step-by-step process that authorizes staff to engage with debtors and work to resolve matters before enforcement actions occur.

Staff said, if introduced, the ordinance would return for a second reading on March 17 with an effective date 30 days after adoption, and that staff will report back after two full years of program implementation (anticipated February 2027) with a holistic review including how the collections policy is working. The council voted to introduce the ordinance unanimously.

The council’s action was an introduction only; the ordinance must complete a scheduled second reading to be adopted and become operative.