Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Vacant Land topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council advances vacant-property maintenance ordinance with fines and enforcement steps

Adelanto City Council · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council advanced Ordinance 661 (first reading), establishing code provisions to require maintenance of vacant parcels (weeds, trash, hazardous structures), setting progressive administrative citation fines and potential property-tax assessment for unpaid fines; council discussed implementation details including warning notices, contractor lists, drone documentation and staffing.

The Adelanto City Council moved to introduce and schedule second reading of a new vacant-property maintenance ordinance (proposed chapter 8.32) that creates a code-based enforcement mechanism for unmaintained vacant parcels.

City Attorney provided the staff report, saying the proposed code would make failure to maintain vacant property a civil enforcement matter with administrative citations and a progressive fine schedule: $100 for a first violation, $200 for a second, $500 for a third, and $1,000 for a fourth and subsequent offense. He said owners would receive notice and an opportunity to cure, daily offenses would be counted separately, and unpaid fines could be put on the property tax roll and ultimately lead to foreclosure if not resolved. He also described nuisance examples such as excessive weeds, trash accumulation, graffiti, hazardous structures, or other conditions that would trigger enforcement.

Councilmembers expressed support for the ordinance and asked about procedural safeguards and implementation details. Councilwoman Stevana Evans asked for a staff update on how the ordinance is working at the first meeting in October; Councilmember questions covered whether a warning citation would precede fines (staff confirmed there is a warning process), whether the city could provide a short list of contractors (staff and the city attorney said the city cannot require property owners to use specific vendors but can provide a list of known providers), and whether the city would add code-enforcement positions. Staff said a code-enforcement recruitment is underway and that the city will explore leveraging an existing drone expert to document problem parcels and provide before/after photos while addressing privacy concerns.

The council voted to advance the ordinance for a second reading; staff indicated formal adoption would be scheduled on the consent calendar at the next meeting unless changes are requested. Council asked staff to return in October with a status report on enforcement outcomes.