Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
La Mesa council unanimously approves consent calendar and reappoints members to outside boards
Summary
The council voted unanimously Jan. 13 to approve the consent calendar and to reappoint or reassign members to several regional boards and ad hoc subcommittees, including a reassignment on SANDAG and consensus to keep most subcommittee compositions unchanged.
Get email alerts on the Governance Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The La Mesa City Council unanimously approved the consent calendar and moved through a slate of reappointments and assignments to regional boards and ad hoc subcommittees at its Jan. 13 meeting.
Vice Mayor Casares moved to approve the consent calendar and Council member Suzuki seconded; the clerk recorded the motion as carried with all council members voting yes.
On reappointments, the mayor proposed several reassignment changes for outside boards. The mayor said he would "step down in SANDAG" and that Vice Mayor Casares would serve as primary with Council member Dillard as the alternate; Council member Lothian would remain a second alternate. The council agreed to keep the composition of most standing and ad hoc subcommittees the same unless a member requested a change. Vice Mayor Casares also asked to be added to the Future MacArthur Park subcommittee, and that amendment was adopted as part of the broader motion. The meeting record shows the motions carried with all council members voting yes.
Items covered in the appointments discussion included MTS, SANDAG, Metro Wastewater, Heartland Communications (primary and alternate), Heartland Fire Training Authority, Mission Trails Park, Metro Water JPA, La Mesa Spring Valley, and others. Council members who volunteered to serve on specific agencies or to continue as primary or alternate were recorded during the discussion; the mayor asked if anyone objected and then moved to adopt the reappointments in one motion.
The approval was procedural and carried unanimously; no contested nominations or roll‑call tallies by individual name were recorded in the minutes beyond the "all voting yes" notation.

