Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves demolition of unsafe 400 South Pine garage with replacement conditions
Summary
After finding the detached garage at 400 South Pine in hazardous condition, the Planning Commission approved demolition with conditions that replacement structures reflect the original character when rebuilt and that salvaged materials be reused where feasible; the chair recused on this item.
The Nevada City Planning Commission approved a demolition permit for a deteriorated garage at 400 South Pine Street on a vote taken after discussion of public-safety and historic-preservation concerns.
Staff presented photos and a site assessment showing the garage had come off its footings and was being held by trees; code enforcement had indicated the structure was in hazardous condition. The applicant said he initially hoped to stabilize the structure but, after inspection and cost review, decided demolition was the prudent option and said he would salvage what material he could for reuse.
Commissioners and staff discussed property-line encroachment and the potential need for future variances if the owner seeks to rebuild in the same footprint or to expand. Staff noted the Planning Commission may require the replacement building to reflect the style and character of the demolished Motherlode-style structure and that, in typical cases, architectural plans for a replacement may accompany a demolition application; because of the hazardous condition, staff recommended approving demolition now with conditions tied to future replacement review.
A motion to approve demolition carried; the approval included the staff-recommended conditions that the applicant obtain a county building permit for demolition, coordinate timely removal with city code enforcement, and that any future replacement structure be of similar style, proportion and siding treatment, with the storage container removed once it is no longer needed. Chair Brown recused from the item because of proximity of residence and did not participate in the vote.
The applicant will need to file any future design or variance applications for the replacement structure and must comply with timeline and inspection conditions to be coordinated with city staff and code enforcement.
