Residents press Montclair council with accusations against Council member Lopez as recall effort advances
Loading...
Summary
Multiple residents used public comment to accuse Council member Lopez of visiting recall petition signers and other misconduct; speakers said evidence will be submitted and demanded the council disclose litigation costs. City officials said the matter will be placed on the next agenda and that related costs will be included.
Multiple Montclair residents used the public-comment period at the city council meeting to press allegations against Council member Ben Lopez and to defend a petition campaign seeking his removal.
Alice Garcia told the council that Lopez "used the addresses on a public filing to show up at my neighbor's front doors," calling the visits "a desperate attempt at intimidation" and saying she would submit photos and other evidence for the city's records. She said the conduct, in her view, justified a recall and accused Lopez of behavior she said had been "proven in court," using a censored term in the transcript: "court finding of ****** harassment." Garcia asked the city to include her evidence in the permanent minutes.
Edmund Garcia Sr., who identified himself as Garcia's husband, told the council the allegations were true and said residents should not be "complicit" in the face of wrongdoing. Bruce Cole later urged the council to publicly reprimand Lopez, asked for disclosure of how much the city's budget has paid in litigation and damages, and invited Lopez to meet petition signers.
Mayor (Chair) replied that the subject is not on the current agenda and that if Lopez wished to address these matters he could do so under public comment. City Manager Stark told the council that the item "will be" on the next city council meeting and that the upcoming agenda "will include the cost of the, all the cost involved as well." City Attorney Robbins advised that procedural rules (Brown Act constraints on unscheduled agenda items) apply and suggested addressing some questions as public comment or in closed session where appropriate.
The allegations and the recall effort were the most sustained set of public comments at the meeting. Speakers called for transparency about legal costs and for council action; the council did not take formal action on the accusations at this meeting but acknowledged the matter will appear on the next agenda.
Why this matters: The comments raise questions about an elected official's conduct and about city spending for litigation and settlements. The council's next meeting will include an item that the mayor said will provide cost details and related issues.
The council moved on without voting on the recall-related demands; the city manager and city attorney indicated procedural pathways for handling the matter, and the council anticipated placing the subject on the next meeting agenda for further consideration.
