Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Art topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council narrows public-art code to allow performances and digital work; ordinance passes 3-2

Manhattan Beach City Council · March 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council adopted an amendment to Manhattan Beach Municipal Code section 10.9.0.06 to broaden allowable public-art expenditures to include performances, digital and temporary works; the measure passed 3-2 amid concerns about fund priorities and definitions.

On March 17, the City Council introduced and adopted ordinance 26-0006, amending Manhattan Beach Municipal Code section 10.9.0.06 to expand the types of public art the city'9s Art in Public Places fee may fund. The change adds sound installations, video, digital and hybrid works, and "performances presented by professional or amateur performers," while retaining council approval for allocations.

Senior Planner Ted Pateros explained the amendment is intended to modernize the code and align the city with current practice in peer coastal cities. Eric Brinkman, senior recreation supervisor for cultural arts, told council the Cultural Arts Commission and council would still vet and approve any allocations and that temporary works and performances typically cost less than major permanent sculptures.

Several council members expressed concern about the implications for the existing public-art trust fund, which staff reported holds about $1.6 million: roughly $1.0 million already allocated and approximately $600,000 unallocated. Council members asked for definitions and guidance to preserve the program'9s original goal of funding substantial permanent works; staff said the arts master plan update will consider definitions and that council retains final approval of expenditures.

Public speakers were split: some urged modernization to reach broader audiences and allow programming that activates the city, while others asked for guardrails and clearer budget guidance. After debate, the ordinance passed on a 3-2 vote.

Council directed that the Cultural Arts Commission'9s upcoming arts master plan work include clear definitions and suggested council guidance on balancing permanent and temporary works and program maintenance obligations.