Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission approves Sprinkles storefront changes on Burlingame Avenue with design notes

City of Burlingame Planning Commission · June 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners supported a Sprinkles tenant fit‑out at 1315 Burlingame Ave, including a recessed 'cupcake ATM' feature and decorative screening, and moved the facade changes to consent with requests for a central mullion and 3‑D renderings.

The Burlingame Planning Commission voted June 9 to advance exterior facade changes for a Sprinkles cupcake bakery at 1315 Burlingame Avenue, recommending minor refinements to balance brand elements with the street frontage.

Staff said the tenant space (3,764 square feet) was previously a jewelry store and Sprinkles will remodel interior space and change the storefront along Burlingame Avenue. Applicant Rachel Johnson, the franchisee, described corporate support and introduced a branded “cupcake ATM” vending kiosk recessed at the storefront; Sprinkles construction director Brad Killian said the decorative pink powder‑coated steel screen will be opaque and is used at most Sprinkles locations.

Architects explained the design adds a recessed, framed portal with bronze‑finish storefront glass and a screening element matching the ATM material. Commissioners encouraged the team to consider a vertical mullion in the upper pane above the door to echo historic divisions and requested a three‑dimensional rendering to illustrate the recess/depth. Several commissioners said they welcomed the lively tenant and saw no need to retain prior storefront details.

Motion language directed minor refinements (central mullion, clarify top trim treatment, and provide a side‑angle 3‑D view) and the commission approved moving the item to consent. Staff recorded the action as not appealable.

Next steps: applicant to return with 3‑D renderings and details showing mullion and top‑trim treatment for final consent review.