Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rancho Palos Verdes moves to tighten mixed‑use and residential overlay rules after appellate decision
Summary
Council approved an urgency ordinance and initiated a regular ordinance to amend mixed‑use and residential overlay rules so new projects allow up to 100% residential use and set a 50% minimum residential floor‑area requirement, in response to a recent California appellate court ruling.
Rancho Palos Verdes city staff and the City Council moved March 3 to amend municipal code language governing the Mixed Use Overlay District (Chapter 17.47) and the Residential Overlay District (Chapter 17.48) to align ordinances with a California Court of Appeal decision.
Planning staff told the council the October 2025 appellate ruling in New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach found that overlays cannot be used to satisfy statutory minimum residential use requirements where base zoning permits nonresidential‑only development. “The appellate court agreed with the petitioners and held that an overlay cannot be used to satisfy the minimum density of residential use requirements,” a planning staff presenter summarized.
To address that holding, staff proposed text amendments that would require any new development or additions in the overlay districts to allow 100% residential use and to require that residential uses occupy at least 50% of gross floor area in a mixed‑use project. Staff recommended adoption of an urgency ordinance to take effect immediately (four‑fifths vote required) and the parallel initiation of the standard ordinance process, including a Planning Commission public hearing and subsequent City Council readings.
Council members asked whether the amendments would shield the city from new legal exposure and whether they could prevent more severe state actions such as builder’s‑remedy challenges. The city attorney advised the amendments reduce litigation risk and do not require changes to the housing element itself. Council member Lewis moved to pass staff’s recommendation; the motion passed on roll call.
Next steps: staff will proceed with the urgency ordinance adoption and advance the non‑urgency ordinance through Planning Commission review and subsequent council hearings; staff anticipated returning with the regular ordinance for introduction in April or May.
Why it matters: The code changes are intended to close a legal gap flagged by the appellate decision and ensure the city’s implementing zoning clearly allows residential development in overlay districts so the city’s housing‑element implementation complies with state law.
